Global Peace As A Frequency – Not An External – Saviour

A personal-academic testimony in my journey towards understanding peace.

While attending the UN-mandated University for Peace {UPEACE} in 2005-2006, I was presented with a number of different concepts where noted global individuals presented their ideas/concepts of peace. Some of those you will find further down in a conversation I had with Microsoft Copilot (A.I.) about the subject of peace.

To my dismay, what I discovered was that there was NO holistic, broadly-accepted definition for the word ‘peace’. Yes, we have heard about Johan Galtungs’ idea of ‘positive’ peace and ‘negative’ peace, and we were hearing things about the Gaia hypothesis, Martin Luther King, Mahatma Gandhi and others, but I could not find a common, holistic understanding of this word ‘peace’.

In my mind, I could not comprehend a concept of peace as being ‘positive’ or ‘negative’, nor could I see value in any context that includes words like ‘violence’, even when referring to ‘lack of violence’.  Humanity was using this, seemingly powerful word to justify actions, positive and negative worldwide, and yet over the course of this present lifetime, we have not been able to create peace on our planet.

Neale Donald Walsch, in his book, ‘Tomorrow’s God’ summarizes this: “Even today, with all your powers of instant communication and total connection and advanced comprehension and increased awareness and sophisticated technology and marvellous miracles, you can’t produce the simple, humble experience for which humanity has yearned from the beginning of time. You can’t produce peace.”

The only “issue”, if one wants to call it that, with this quote is the word ‘produce’.  The message of the G4L is that ‘peace’ as a holistic experience, is CREATED, or flows through one’s BE-ing peace.

Just like the idea of perpetual war (for commercial profit), I was beginning to see the corruption in the whole message of peace.

PEACE as a HOLISTIC EXPERIENCE is IMPOSSIBLE within a paradigm that controls people through debt, fear, sickness and separation. Anything that a leader, negotiator, researcher, teacher or institution might CLAIM about peace was an illusion.

There is quote that, loosely translated, states that it is impossible to get someone to understand something, when it contradicts one’s livelihood. What this means is that how can anyone claim to want ‘peace’, when their very careers, reputations, salaries and more are dependent upon conditions that are the exact opposite to peace??

I was beginning to realize that the ‘peace education’ thing was nothing more than a scam to keep making money, while claiming to be working for something that is impossible to achieve within the current paradigm of thinking.

Einstein is credited with a quote that states that it is impossible to solve a problem from within the same line of thinking that created it. Therefore ‘peace’ as a holistic experience could never be achieved within a paradigm that functions on debt, control, fear and illness.

So, it is necessary to think outside of that box of the current systems of geopolitics, geoeconomics and religions.

In his documentary, “It’s Not Just Empty Space”, Canadian environmental scientist David Suzuki tried to share that we ARE the Earth, and that there is a VERY PROFOUND connection between humanity, all life and with our planet itself.

https://naturalheroes.org/videos/its-not-just-empty-space-with-david-suzuki

Suzuki explains to us this profound connection and how we are ALL connected to Earth, Fire, Air, and Water.

I was beginning to put into words, an understanding that had been within me for a long time previously.

The Great ‘Separation’ And How It Relates To Peace

As the vision of the Greenprint started to form in my mind and heart back in the late ‘90s, it was getting easier for me to see the things that were not working well around the planet.

Humanity would not be ready for the message that I am now going to share, one that I have been connected to as have many other individuals who have been patiently, or not so patiently, waiting for the shift in human and planetary consciousness that is now becoming more visible.

Back around the 1500’s there was a separation of sorts, between those looking at explaining the phenomena of that which was on Earth, and that which was beyond Earth. Science was given the responsibility of explaining all things Earthly-related, and religion was given the responsibility of being responsible for explaining ‘faith’ and phenomena beyond Earth.

Science

Since that time, science remained focused on purely physical aspects of science: physics, chemistry, biology, and its related sub-categories. I’m going to call this a three-dimensional understanding or 3D. We were taught to believe that Earth, and the planets in our solar system, responded to certain ‘laws’ that were allegedly ‘absolute’.

This is slightly misleading. As a result of the ‘great separation’, we were lacking a bigger understanding that could have contributed to the understanding of science.

Moving forward to present day, those who have been controlling the messages coming from ‘science’, have still been ignoring the releasing of this information, but more and more people were starting have certain experiences that were beginning to defy the conventional understanding of science.

Some individuals were perceiving ‘something’, in some cases physical, or at least appearing physical; some were perceiving through other senses in their bodies. Children have always had this ability, but our ‘physical’ society-conditioning taught children to deny a part of themselves that would later become so important to their experience as humans.

EVERY aspect of science, as we have known it, has contributed to a piece of the understanding, but the connections between all the sciences were never made, to create an illusion of separation.

Religion

Since that time, religions have been, for the most part, sharing a message that humanity was born in separation from the Divine Creator/Source (DC/S) or ‘god’. These messages created an impression in the minds of the people that we were created ‘in the image of god’. This left the interpretation in peoples’ minds that ‘god’ was humanoid in form. Very few people questioned this, because another message that was taught to people was that this ‘god’ was vengeful and that if we did not adhere to certain laws or beliefs, or if we did not listen to certain ‘elders’ allegedly given authority to represent this ‘God’ we would be condemned to this place they called ‘hell’.

Most religions have shared similar messages relating that humans were ‘born into sin’ and that the only way back to this DC/S was through the church and their ordained ministers.

Religions as well, are offering a misleading message. While the messages remain mostly in agreement that there is some kind of ‘entity’ beyond our understanding that is responsible for the creation of our planet and of humanity, the messages were lacking a bigger understanding that were beginning to defy the conventional understanding of religions.

Some individuals were perceiving and experiencing ‘something’ more than what was within the framework of their conventional religious beliefs. They were starting to wonder why religions were preaching one message about how ‘god’ created all things, but that this ‘God’ would also punish its creations for not following rules, when, allegedly, we were given free will to experience being human. There was a growing conflict in messages. As well, people started to ask why a religion preaches ‘peace’ and ‘unity’ while at the same time condemning all who would not adhere to that particular belief. Today, people are now seeing that those allegedly representing this ‘god’ are involved in activities that are in contradiction to the very rules the faiths claim to adhere to. Pedophilia, sex-trafficking and child marriages. People wondered why a faith would create not only a separation between humanity and this ‘god’ and why ‘god’ would allow people to fight amongst each other allegedly in the name of their ‘god’.

ALL religions, like science, contain pieces of the overall understanding but never make the full connection. None are ‘wrong’. They are just lacking the deeper and more complete understanding.

What’s Going On?

Something was beginning to happen that was making the controllers of our global institutions and religions very nervous. People were starting to have experiences beyond what was being taught to them. They were starting to question things that challenged the current knowledge or evidence. People were starting to ‘tune in’ to something beyond themselves, and were seeing a greater understanding that could transcend the current understandings of both science and religion.

In science, there were new discoveries being made that challenged the traditional laws. Science was not only discovering that EVERYTHING is ENERGY, but that this energy acts upon, AND reacts to, energies around it.

An entirely new dynamic was introduced into the human equation and I think it was CONSCIOUSNESS.

Humanity was evolving, and it was becoming increasingly aware that there is NO DISTINCTION NOR DIFFERENCE between the experiences of religions and the experiences of science relative to the human existence.

Being profoundly connected to everything that exists on our planet, combining an advanced understanding of science, with an advanced understanding that ‘go’ is not something to seek externally, but rather something to be experienced internally changes our relation with LIFE.

As late-author Dr. Wayne Dyer stated: “if you change the way you look at things, the things you look at, change”

We are NO LONGER human beings seeking a spiritual connection. We ARE SPIRITUAL BEINGS having a human experience.

There is NO separation, other than the labels of separation such as race, religion, culture, orientation, gender, caste, status, nationality, political belief, and on and on and on that have been socialized, normalized and conditioned into us for the purposes of controlling humanity.

The Geopolitical & Geoeconomical Components of Peace

When I ended my career working with multinational companies, I was feeling a strong calling to seek academic validation for the Greenprint4LIFE, or G4L.

I chose to apply to the UN-mandated University for Peace in Costa Rica, believing at that time that the institution was honourable and committed to global, holistic peace.

I was guided to apply for the Peace Education program.  My first experience with UPEACE ended up being discriminated against, which shocked me.  I was not in a good financial position at that time, having been dishonourably treated by one whom I thought was a friend, and to whom I loan a very significant amount of money in business and personal loans, and for which I was never repaid.

I applied for a scholarship to attend the university, but I was denied, purely because I was a citizen of Canada, and the university assumed that western students were wealthy enough to subsidize students from other countries around the world. I ended up taking out a significant student loan to attend this university, and I began to see during the year that the students getting subsidized were actually wealthier than I was, and this began to make me question the true nature of this institution that CLAIMED to be working for global peace.

While at UPEACE, and as I was preparing my Master’s thesis on the Greenprint4LIFE, I discovered that there was no, broadly-accepted, holistic definition of the word ‘peace’.  This began to make me question what it was, really, that leaders worldwide were claiming, when they claimed to be want peace, or were working for peace.

I discovered that leaders claim about wanting to ‘create peace’; that diplomats were claiming to ‘negotiate peace’; that researchers were claiming to ‘measure and quantify peace’; that academics were claiming to study peace, and that institutions, like UPEACE, were claiming to ‘teach peace’.   This became deeply unsettling to me, as I realized that none of the individuals in positions listed above, and also other positions, never TRULY wanted global peace.  They merely wanted the salary, the benefits, the perks, the glory, the recognition and the status of being attached to the peace profession without ever attaining the goal they were claiming to strive for.
Their salaries, benefits, perks, privileges, status, recognition and glory DEPENDED upon a perpetual state of PEACELESSNESS in the world.  Why would they ever truly want peace, when everything they are getting depends upon the world not attaining peace?

The thesis became a form of academic rebellion for me.  I went on ‘strike’ for a time, because the program required me to write a curriculum to teach peace.  The entire argument the thesis and the G4L was making was that it is not ‘peaceful’ to force all students into learning the same material, when each soul is uniquely different, yet equally beautiful and has unique learning methods and a unique LIFE-path to follow.  I finally finished the thesis on the condition that I was allowed to put a disclaimer paragraph at the beginning of the ‘curriculum’, stating that the curriculum was a structurally-mandated requirement of UPEACE, and that it DID NOT support the holistic vision of peace that the G4L was advocating.

The thesis, and the G4L proposed new and very bold definitions for two words:  LIFE (capitalized) and ‘peace’.

LIFE (capitalized) is:  “An ever-evolving process encompassing the ALL THAT IS, including the physical/non-physical; the visible/invisible and the known/unknown that serve to support and sustain all things, not only on Earth, but also beyond.”

Flowing from the definition above, the definition that the G4L offers to the world is this:

Peace ~  “An internal knowing and feeling of unconditional love for, and service to LIFE, relative to one’s uniquely different yet equally beautiful relation to LIFE, in each moment of ‘now’.”

The programs at UPEACE NEVER taught students about being enslaved to criminally fraudulent systems of banking, law and religions.  Indeed, they offered programs that only played along with the lies and frauds that I was seeing in the world.  Law programs would NOT address the criminally-corrupt system of admiralty law that created commercial rules given the power of law, for example.  There were other examples also.  The university kept growing and expanding on the promise and the premise of striving to create global peace, but in all the 30+ years of claiming, they never exposed all the things that were the reasons for why peace is impossible within the current paradigm.

 

Years later, I would contact UPEACE, asking for a full refund of my tuition because I felt that they did not honour what they were claiming to practice and teach and that they discriminated against me.  I was denied the refund, and I began calling out this institution on their systemic hypocrisy.

Ask anyone today why we do not have peace in our world, and the vast majority will give any one of a thousand reasons, assigning blame to some other entity or individual.

What those people never did however was acknowledge the one very simple reason why we really don’t have peace in our world, nor did they ever acknowledge their own role and responsibility in creating the experience which they were claiming to want.

While the G4L has been saying this since 2006, very few, if any at that time or for ten years after at least, would state the very simple reason why we could not have peace in our world.

That very simple reason is this:   PEACE IS NOT PROFITABLE.

================================================================

The Spiritual Component to Peace

Most people, even today in 2025, and even less in 2007, have difficulty seeing a holistic, spiritual component to ‘peace’, but would rather look at peace from the perspective of religious beliefs, which, as mentioned earlier is hypocritical.

Religions teach that we are humans born into sin, and that we have to worship and be in fear of ‘God’.  To gain favour with their ‘God’, one would have to follow the dictates of those within specific faiths, and if one did not follow those dictates, the ‘God’ would send them to hell for eternity.

Even when I was 9 or 10 years old, attending church in my hometown this never made sense to me. I abandoned religious practices sometime shortly after my confirmation.  I saw too much confusion and hypocrisy in religion, and this has become even more glaringly clear after witnessing churches demand that people wear masks and get injected with biological weapons, instead of following their own scriptures (christian at least), where ‘God’ would protect those who follow this ‘God’.  Daniel in the lion’s den, and the story of Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego being thrown into the furnace being protected are two very notable examples.

The G4L offers that we are NOT separate from the Divine Creator/Souce.  We are a part of this Source, and this Source resides within each and every one, regardless of whether one is evil or if one is loving and honourable.

We are not humans born into sin, needing to search for and worship some remote ‘God’ who would punish for not following commandments, DESPITE giving each of us the Divine gift of free will to create, just as our Creator created us.  Rather, we are spiritual beings having a human experience.

We come here, to this 3D matrix holographic playground to experience the duality and the illusion of being separated from the Divine Creator/Source so that we can have the experience of remembering and knowing who we ARE (spiritual beings) through these illusory experiences of NOT being who we are.

Who one is, may be better on day, and not another.  One tries to be the best one can be, and honour LIFE with each day, with each choice, and with each creation.

This is how the holistic definition of ‘peace’ was born, as defined by the G4L.  It is a definition that includes far more than most other notable definitions of peace.  Gandhi may have come the closest, stating that one should “BE THE CHANGE ONE WANTS TO SEE IN THE WORLD”.  Many eastern and oriental religions along with indigenous spirituality, have aspects that are more closely aligned to the G4L definition of ‘peace’.

The definition offered by the G4L is not only more holistic than any other current known definition, but it also incorporates elements that no other definition, such as the element of personal responsibility in honouring LIFE and co-creating peace on Earth.  The G4L also acknowledges that the spiritual journey is never ‘perfect’.  There would be no human journey of experiencing LIFE without this illusion of darkness and separation.

The definition states that it is relevant to one’s uniquely different yet equally beautiful relation with LIFE, in EACH MOMENT OF NOW.

How ‘peaceful’ one is, relative to one’s relation to LIFE in each moment, and in any different moment, one may be in fear or hate, whle in other moments be filled with joy and love for LIFE.

Peace becomes relevant in each moment, relative to how one perceives LIFE in that moment, and it is subject to change, according to the spiritual-growth for that soul.

EACH AND EVERYONE ONE OF US CAME HERE TO LEARN AND EXPERIENCE SOMETHING. This is the purpose of one’s life – to remember who you are.  The MEANING to LIFE comes in one sharing the message that this soul came to share with the world.